Critical Section


Weighting Links

Sunday,  02/16/03  09:21 AM

TO: suggestions@google.com; contact@pyra.com
FROM: ole@pacbell.net
SUBJECT: <A HREF= WEIGHT=>

Google:

Now that you’ve bought Pyra, you’re in a perfect position to make a slight but powerful enhancement to the HTML spec.  You should support <A HREF= WEIGHT=>.  The [optional] weight= attribute of links is ignored by browsers, but is used by search engine spiders like yours to determine the relevance of a link.  Positive weights from 1-9 mean “This content is related to this link”, with the value connoting the degree of relevance (1 means “this content is very slightly related to this link”, 9 means “this content is completely related to this link”).  Zero values mean “This link doesn’t have anything to do with this content”.  A value of -1 means “This content relates to the opposite of this link”.  The default would be +5.

Examples:

Check out <A HREF=http://www.google.com>Google</A>, a great search engine.  (Default=+5)
I just read that <A HREF=http://www.google.com WEIGHT=9>Google</A> bought Pyra.
The word <A HREF=http://www.google.com WEIGHT=2>Google</A> means a really big number.
Turns out <A HREF=http://www.google.com WEIGHT=0>Google</A> is not a pipe.
Remember that <A HREF=http://w-uh.com WEIGHT=0>Critical Section</A> is not Google.
I think <A HREF=http://w-uh.com WEIGHT=-1>Google</A> isn’t a dictionary.

This idea can be extended to images not in a link (images in a link use the weight of the link).  Examples:

A great search engine: <IMG SRC=http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif>  (Default=+5)
The Google logo is: <IMG SRC=http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif WEIGHT=9>
This logo changes on holidays: <IMG SRC=http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif WEIGHT=2>
This is not a pipe: <IMG SRC=http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif WEIGHT=0>
Not the Google logo: <IMG SRC= http://w-uh.com/images/critical_section_logo.jpg WEIGHT=0>
This logo is not gaudy: <IMG SRC=http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif WEIGHT=0>

You could support this unilaterally, and with your support the meme takes off.  Pyra could make it available in their ‘blogging tools, reinforcing the meme. 

Perhaps other blogosphere leaders like Userland would pick this up, too.  What do you think?

Ole

====================================
Ole Eichhorn
CTO, Aperio Technologies - www.aperio.com
(650) 814-9620 cell

W=UH

Home
Archive
'11   '10   '09
'08   '07   '06
'05   '04   '03
flight
Re:Cycling
Re:The Book
Re:Software
Re:Philosophy
About Me
W=UH
Email

RSS   OPML

Greatest Hits
Correlation vs. Causality
The Tyranny of Email
Unnatural Selection
Lying
Aperio's Mission = Automating Pathology
On Blame
Try, or Try Not
Books and Wine
Google and Blogs
Emergent Properties
God and Beauty
Moving Mount Fuji The Nest Rock 'n Roll
IQ and Populations
Are You a Bright?
Adding Value
Confidence
The Joy of Craftsmanship
The Emperor's New Code
Toy Story
The Return of the King
Religion vs IQ
Most Spectacular Photos of 2003
In the Wet
the big day
solving bongard problems
visiting Titan
unintelligent design
Shorthorn
the nuclear option
second gear
On the Persistence of Bad Design...
Texas chili cookoff
the inflection point
almost famous design and stochastic debugging
may I take your order?
paper art
triple double
China's olympic gardens
New Yorker covers
Death Rider! (da da dum)
how did I get here (Mt.Whitney)?
the Law of Significance
Holiday Inn
Daniel Jacoby's photographs
room with a view
weird disaster update
in praise of paddle shifting
the first bird
Gödel Escher Bach: Birthday Cantatatata
shining a light
Father's Day (in pictures)
Tour de France 2009
Tour de France 2010
Jobsnotes of note
Tour de France 2011